Wednesday, 2 January 2008

IP Address.07 – a week at Ingestre Pavilion: Part the Seventh

Wednesday, 29 August 2007

In which we drop in on another Outpost of Nobility, have a Quality Luncheon, and see an Odd But Inspiring Gothic Girder Lorry. The Bigness of Housing is discussed and a Pink Pig takes a wrong turn.

Hurrah! This is the Day of Going to Chatsworth, something I have been meaning to get round to for the last several decades. I wasn't disappointed.

Just as an aside, Chatsworth occupies a special place in von Neustadt family mythology. My very nice Canadian cousins Tom and Val were staying with us in Bristol in the mid-1970s. They had a hired car they'd dubbed the Pink Pig - a Hillman Avenger or something I think - and I was very impressed with what well-informed tourists they were. It was they who first told me of the wonder that is Chatsworth and I resolved then to see it for myself one day. They were - despite the style error that their car represented - pretty cool people and I admired them greatly.

I admired them no less when they returned from their Chatsworth expedition. Pausing only briefly to catch their breath in Bristol, they explained that although they'd been all the way to some place in the southwest with a similar name (or something), it turned out that the famous house of that exact name was more sort of, well, in Derbyshire, 172 miles from us in Bristol and more like 250 miles from where they'd been on their trip to some southwestern near-namesake. The thing that amazed me was that they were entirely unbothered by all this, where I'd have tended to see it as a major calamity. Someone then pointed out to me that to Tom and Val, as Canadians, an accidental diversion of 200 miles was not a big deal, indeed that it was more of a vanishingly small deal, the sort of distance you drive twice before breakfast for a pint of milk and the newspaper. This of course made me admire them even more. Bear in mind that it wasn't so far in my past that the 21-mile drive from Guisborough to Whitby in our ancient Ford Popular 103E had seemed like a very, very major expedition, and not just to us kids. So how cool was it to mistakenly drive a fair fraction of the length of England and hardly notice? Very very cool, yes Tamsin, is the correct answer.

Aside: Sadly, my memory does not serve me that well in the above paragraph - there isn't another place called Chatsworth in the UK than I can see. There are, however, other possibilities for confusion - taking a random example, you could be trying for Ashford-in-the-Water, Derbyshire and end up in Ashford, North Devon ... something like that perhaps ... or whatever. If I get the chance I will ask Tom if he remembers!

Anyway, back in 2007 we were certainly not heading the wrong way. It was a nice drive up there, with glimpses of exciting landscape starting to develop as we neared the Peak District. We also went through some towns and villages which reminded me strongly of favourite haunts further north. Is this limestone-related, I wonder?

Becca was in her own car for this bit so we had some of the usual amusing When Satnavs Fall Out moments where you see the other car do something apparently bizarre because its satnav's Weltanschauung (haha, literally for a change!) differs from what yours thinks. It's a pity the two devices can't talk to each other, ask after the family, shoot the breeze a bit, put the world to rights, gossip about the bingo, have a nice old discussion, and reach a consensus about what we're doing in 300 yards. I bet they will, one day.

A rambling digression about GPS has been removed from here, shipped stone by stone to a new site, and painstakingly reassembled using old photos as a guide.

So there we were arriving at Chatsworth. It's fantastic. Once you're on its estate you still have what feels like miles of parkland to drive through before you eventually see the house, then you arrive impressively, across a bridge then sweeping round almost past the front door. Well, A door.

Parking and all that stuff was pretty painless and well organized: they have plenty of space and staff, and use them well. Once we'd assembled the platoon and coughed up a small fortune (this is a stately home, remember, and these things don't come cheap) we were off into the garden, this being another one where we'd decided to skip the house this time. We were once again very lucky with the weather, which does help just a wee bit when the entire structure of your day depends on your ability to stay outside.

It was reasonably busy but not outrageously so and it was the usual thing, that the crowding lessens exponentially with the distance you can be bothered to walk. We wandered - well, not that far really - and found a lovely, blissful spot for our picnic. The whole business of the setting and the weather was pretty good anyway but it was all offset nicely by the use of the new, incredibly classy Posh Picnic Rucksack Thing which Jo and Paul had given us for our 100th birthday. We'd been waiting for a suitably upmarket occasion to christen this fine portable luncheon facility and, my word, doesn't Chatsworth fit the bill just perfectly?

I am sure I am the very last person in the Northern Hemisphere to have seen one of these things but I was quite excited by it so forgive me if I witter for a moment or two. Basically it is an updated version of the picnic hamper, rucksackized and trendied up. Now that so many of have fallen on hard times and had to let some of the servants go this is probably a good idea. Anyway, once you have carried it (on your own back!) to the place of picnicking, it sort of opens out and there's all your nice picnic equipment strapped in, plates and cutlery and napkins and glasses and what have you; your wine is in an insulated sleeve; the food likewise in a place of safety; there's a matching blanket strapped on the outside ... and so on.

So we sat with our splendid picnic in this splendid environment, looking out over house, garden and parkland and, d'you know what, it was pretty jolly good.

I must stop daydreaming about how nice the picnic was and try to press on with the Emuārs Entry before I forget everything. Let's see:

  • Lots of long walks and paths, formal and less so
  • Massive cascade thing on the hill behind the house. Martha came all the way down this in the water as it is essentially a flight of stone steps with water flowing down it. Walking in it is discouraged but not forbidden.
  • Various folly-like "ruined" and naturalistic bits. O la and fie!
  • A really good maze which confused me quite thoroughly.
  • A lovely long walk up and round and behind and - over there.
  • Fabulous clever waterfall, just a small stream but going on for quite a long descent. What's the big deal? It's made entirely of stone troughs, that's what. Difficult to describe why this is so nice but picture, thousand words, blah etc. I'd like one in my garden anyway, if we ever recover those estates from that so-called "provisional government" of corrupt shoemenders and incompetent blacksmiths, led by a leering ninny of a ... What? Oh yes, sorry. On on.
  • There's some kind of tree collection. Oh good Lord what a stupid comment: the whole blessed place is a tree collection. Let me try again. There's some kind of special list of Chatsworth's Top Thirty Great Trees (or words to that effect, jabnaas) that you're meant to "collect" as you go round. It's mainstream enough that's it on the ordinary map, rather than some separate leaflet. I tried to spot those that were on our route, but enjoyed a very limited success. Many of the large, treelike objects looked quite a lot like many of the other large, treelike objects and none of them had a big colourful badge saying, "Hi! I'm a Top Thirty Tree!!" so I was a bit Lost'n'Clueless™ in this matter. (Perhaps Chatsworth could consult Virgin Active on how to do proper signage: Lovely Tree Zone ! Old House Place ! Nice Park Thing ! Ah yes, I can see it now.)
  • Somewhere up above the trough waterfall there's quite a large lake, overlooked by a splendid rustic/ruined stone folly or summerhouse, with a cave underneath.
  • All along the top of where we walked were bits of the system of reservoirs and waterways, artfully contrived to have exquisite, naturalistic-looking streams running along and down the hill (and perhaps supplying the cascade?) It's blatantly fake but absolutely gorgeous.
  • There was some sort of sculpture event on, so that there were interesting things all round the gardens. There was quite a lot of what I'd call (not meaning to disparage it, just an ignorant person's shorthand) Normal Large Modern Sculpture, which I very much liked. A few pieces I thought were over the top, perhaps a bit too cheesy and/or in-your-face, but your mileage may vary. I was intrigued by one quite odd piece, a large and beautifully detailed model truck made from a sort of Gothic Meccano. Do they now make Gothic Meccano? Did the sculptor invent the girders, or adapt them from elsewhere, or what? Dunno, but it was certainly an interesting and unusual object. If you've seen the film Dune I hope you'll know what I mean by Victorian Gothic Brass Retro-High Technology? A bit like that.
  • A very pretty, intensively flowery place that I think may have officially been the kitchen garden, or the entrance thereto. Or something.
  • A rather good gardenistic joke, to wit: the "cottage garden". I liked this. You initially go "uh?" then you appreciate the gag, which that it's not the garden of a cottage but rather a cottage made out of garden, with a sofa, dining table, chairs, bed and so on - absolutely brilliant.
  • After a while of this very pleasant wandering, the familial targeting radar was switched to the "tea" setting. There's a nice, unobtrusive café on a terrace near the garden entrance and here we sat outside for a while and contemplated the grandeur all around.

That's pretty much that for the Chatsworth visit. On the way out I was much taken with a folly/tower which overlooks the whole thing from a great height on a wooded ridge. I assume that it's still on the estate, though whether you can reach it as a visiting member of the public is another question: it's certainly outside anything on the garden map. It looks lovely, and must have an incredible view over the house and estate - which I suppose must be why it's there.

Ah yes, the house: I meant to mention it. It's odd to have gone to a very famous big house and not to have seen it; not that I regret in any way the very enjoyable visit we did have, but just that it means I've only seen the house as an exterior so I'm obviously missing quite a lot when I comment on it - and in an afterthought too! Tsk.

For what it's worth, I found the house very impressive and, in a strange way, suited to its site. On the other hand, it really is massive, surely far larger than most other country houses, and this does make it a bit difficult to love. From some angles, despite all the ?classical details and beautiful stone, it reminds almost me more of industry (office or factory?) than of gracious country living. I suppose it's an inevitable consequence of the sheer size of the undertaking ... the whole thing is just, er, big - in a way that, say, Shugborough or Weston Park, though grand, really are not. I suppose that the house was built to provide country living, and entertaining, and display and storage of exquisite possessions, and to impress with its wealth and authority, all on pretty much an industrial scale: so I shouldn't be too surprised that all of this is accommodated in something that gets right in your face rather than blushing coyly behind its lawns and drive. Certainly, it gets its message across.

Having said all that, I found it very striking and would really love to go back some day and see the inside.

One architectural feature than interested me was a sort of two-story extra-high bit at one end of the house. I am sure there's a proper term for it but essentially it's like a pair of corner towers, except that they don't stand alone - they're joined by a sort of section of rooms on one floor and a kind of wall-walk or loggia on the one above: in fact I think that you could probably walk, at the very high level, between the two towers. It's an interesting effect, perhaps a little odd and asymmetrical-looking, and I was rather taken with it: I'd like to understand better what it's doing there.

Eventually we were all Chatsworthed out for one visit and it was time to be off. We were not, however, quite done with Derbyshire yet. With one eye on the moderately long drive back to Ingestre, we decided to have dinner up there and fortunately Becca has a favourite pub not that far off, and Bob's your uncle. It's The Bear Inn at Alderwasley, and it was truly excellent. It's very popular and we hadn't booked but they were very accommodating and we managed just fine at a "non-restaurant" table: the food tasted just fine anyway. I'd strongly recommend this fine boozer and its menu of deliciousness.

It was a fair bit later when we chugged back to the Pavilion. This had been a rather fine day out.

Tuesday, 1 January 2008

IP Address.06 – a week at Ingestre Pavilion: Part the Sixth

Tuesday, 28 August 2007

In which a Walk of Ponkiness and Pulchritude is undertaken; some Bovines are Deluded by Human Cunning; a Great Garden, on a Gradient, is visited; and a Mysterious Nocturnal Assignation takes place near some Cemetery Gates.

To start, Deb and I took Daisy for a nice walk, using I think a leaflet or description from the Pavilion's wonderful stock of information.

We went along to where the lane meets the road, just by Anne's cottage. Then we zoomed straight down the road to where a development is currently failing to enhance the appearance of a formerly-pretty farmhouse. A nice path leads along to, er, a sewage farm, and my goodness you do know it's there, with its delicate, piquant bouquet spicing the air around for some distance.

Reader, if you knew the number of really childish, dreadful poo-related jokes from which you've just been saved by my steely self-restraint and new-found maturity, you'd seek me out and embrace me, I swear.

(Yes, even in the paragraph above.)

The unhelpful urge to speculate about aspects of the Staffordshire diet was suppressed and on we went. Daisy, I might add, was calmly unaffected by all this, though history suggests that somewhere in her grown-up, mature doggy brain, a naughty little puppy instinct was perhaps saying wow, what's that, let's find it and really really roll in it!

The niffoidal aspect of the walk was soon over. Fairly soon over. Well, quite soon. A few minutes. (No, I can't hold my breath that long either. Ah well.)

Having griped about the pongaciousness of this bit of the walk I must add that we were then amply rewarded for our, er, tolerance and fortitude. The walk continued (uphill and upwind!) along an exceedingly pleasant river valley sometimes quite open and sometimes a bit wooded, and always gorgeous. If the Tiny Technical Elves of Blogworld have performed their duties correctly then a nearby photograph will depict Mrs von Neustadt and her faithful (Mad)Hound in just such a place. Really very, very nice indeed. Slight cow-aggro potential was also avoided here, more of which later.

In one pretty woodland bit the leaflet warns you that the public footpath is usually impassable as it's very marshy, and suggests a diversion round the outside; but it hadn't been raining much and we got through dryshod - and it was exquisite in there.

A bit more of that and we were out onto a road chiz. However this led us through the pretty little village of Tixall and eventually back onto footpaths to cut across and get us back up to our lane. There was a good view across Tixall's farm buildings and over to its gatehouse, which of course is a sister Landmark to "our" pavilion and one which I'd very much like to visit one day.

This part of the walk, back up to our lane, was very pleasant, distinguished only by a rather good place where the path was a deep green tunnel mown out of very tall maize, and by another potentially scary encounter with potentially scary mooies.

The reason it was only potentially, not actually, scary relates to a new pet (haha) theory of mine. The cows love or are fascinated by the dog and their insistence on coming for a very close look is the reason for these sometimes-dangerous encounters. However, I don't believe that cattle, lovely though they are, are the very brightest animals around. (I mean, you wouldn't be, would you?) So, my theory states, if you spoil the dog's outline by having her walk very close (even better with two people!), so she has no separate silhouette, then the cows don't really see her. They just think it's a boring old human, albeit an oddly shaped one, and do not trouble themselves counting the legs or whatever. (And anyway bovine numbers, or "cownting", probably doesn't go much further than one, moo, bellow, anudder, etc.)

Obviously this technique isn't going to work if you're already right next to the cattle so they've sussed you and Rover, but my belief is that if they're a little distance off, then doing this may slow down, or prevent, them recognizing the doggy object of their curiosity.

So we managed to zoom unmolested up through this field, hardly even glanced at by our bovine buddies, and back up to our lane and home. Whether this was Vogel's Patent Outline Camouflage Tactic or just luck: dunno, we'd need a large research grant to find out.

A little later we went for today's Gardenoidal Visitor Experience, to the Dorothy Clive Garden. This lovely garden's USP is its accessibility, it having been developed or redeveloped by Colonel Clive (and I think some professional gardeners too) for his wife as she became disabled ... or something. Webbity website. I think they both died some time ago and it's now run by a trust, which seems to be doing an excellent job.

It's situated in North Staffs, just a junction or two up the M6 from us, so it wasn't a huge drive. I really liked this place. The surprising thing - given the USP - is that it's amazingly hilly in places: I suppose this may reflect its not having been originally planned to be accessible. Basically the whole thing is one huge slope, interrupted by interesting less-slopey bits and other landscape moments. It's got about a million paths and - o huge importance! - a lovely tea-room.

Just behind the tea-room, theoretically up-slope from it, is an old quarry which, surprise, is now a quarry garden and a very fine one too. It's got paths and steps and little corners and viewpoints and hidey-holes had water features and - well, the works, basically. Oh and a great big sculpture of a stag. Arooo! It's all the sort of thing I was inordinately fond of aged 10, and as you know little has changed in the last few decades, so I was blissful.

We did have one, ah, exciting moment when a distress call from the Kronprinzessin Becca's personal telephonic device sent me dashing to the almost-rescue. Can you say: power-chair, heavy power-chair, slopey path, gravelly skiddy slopey path, dodgy clutch? Hmm? Indeed yes. I'm almost tempted to add: can you say ejector seat, but fortunately it didn't quite come to that. And let's face it, you'd have to be very careful about tree cover. Whoosh zoom whee thunk aargh, sortafing.

There was also a rather good place up behind the quarry where you could reach the top corner of the garden and have a rather nice view across open countryside; and a gravel garden off to the side of the quarry, a very pretty and tranquil spot. The caff itself is in front of the quarry garden, at the top of the main open(ish) slope. We had our tea (or whatever) on its little level bit, right on the edge of the said slope: an excellent place to sit.

We'd also had a little try at some semi-random cross-lawn wandering in this upper part of the hill, but the combination of (a) the iffy clutch and (b) the tendency of the power-chair to dig in and create its own mini-Passchendaele meant that it was all just a touch alarming so we retreated to nice solid path pretty goshdarned smartish.

Below, the paths take you down through various formal and informal bits - there's a nice Alpine bit down there somewhere too - until you arrive at another focal point, a little lake with lots of marshy and marginally-relevant (aha) vegetation. More than that I don't know (jabnaas), but Becca and I both found that it brought back fond, nay pond, memories of the beautiful Bog Garden at Howick.

That was pretty much it for this visit - we'd found the Dorothy Clive Garden interesting, pretty and well-run so, I'm like, yeah. In fact I think I'm a bit of a Friend of Dorothy!

Othergates, I must just mention one thing. It may have been this night or some other but it's not exactly crucial. We had an Indian takeaway one night. The logbook cheerfully insisted that this particular restaurant knew exactly where the Pavilion was and could deliver to the door, which is certainly a nice thought. The young man to whom I spoke, though, was a lot less convincing. He was one of those people who can exude an air of massive self-confidence in the generality of what they say while fatally undermining it in the detail. So by the time I'd briefed him on exactly where we were, and he'd assured me he knew exactly where it was then rung me back in scarcely-veiled confusion two minutes later, and we'd already been round this cycle a couple of times, I was beginning to feel that we might have a long hungry evening ahead. So we agreed on a compromise, a place close enough but on whose location all parties could definitely agree without trouble.

And that's how Deb and I came to be sitting in the car in the entrance to the cemetery, watching the traffic lights change. It was quite isolated and dark (with green/amber/red tinges, yes). This whole thing seemed odd and perhaps slightly sinister and then when the food-containing car turned up I am sure it looked positively shady. Fortunately we weren't there for long so even if an observant CCTV operator had scrambled Special Branch, the Drug Squad, Vice Squad or the Cemetery-Lurking Squad, the only trace found would have only been a lingering hint of onion bhaji hovering enigmatically near the crossroads. Mmm. Anyway: weird scene, nice food. Good night and thank you: thank you and good night.

IP Address.05 – a week at Ingestre Pavilion: Part the Fifth

Monday, 27 August 2007

In which we discuss Choice, visit a rather good Stately Home, and travel on a small Railway. Luncheon is taken, in a Sort of Gazebo Thing. We disdain a Maze, though without Undue Rudeness.

Continuing with this holiday's Gardens are Good theme we got out the Useful Little Green Leaflet once more and chose today's outing.

Ah, choice! Choice, that Imaginary Friend of the Anxious Middle Classes! That gigantic hallucinatory fruitbat of the desirable balsamic postcodes! That margarine-sculpted-swan-on-a-hot-day of school admissions! Let us examine briefly this matter of choice.

Decision-making in the von Neustadt family is very democratic, being based on best practice observed in politics, unions, shareholders' meetings and the like. So the kids each have one vote, yes, every person-jack of them has their very own vote, and this they may use without fear or favour, entirely beyond the reach of outside influence. The Hound Gänseblümchen gets but half a vote, as she does not entirely meet all the citizenship and literacy requirements. This half-vote she may use without fear or favour, any time she can write an X in the little box or dictate her choice to an amanuensis.

To ensure that certain interests receive fair representation and in accordance with the finest democratic traditions a block voting system is then used for the remainder of the family. As a person of some significance I naturally receive two hundred votes which I may use without fear or favour. Ah yes indeed I do. Finally, Deborah has a block of a mere eight million votes and these, you will be pleased to hear, she uses without fear or favour either. Thus is democracy served and the correct decisions reached: you know it makes sense.

Anyway, the decision was that we were going to Weston Park, and a darned fine decision it turned out to be. It's a very impressive estate some way out to the southwest of Stafford: indeed I think that en route we pretty much passed the area of yesterday's walk.

Weston Park covers a huge area and when we arrived they were still removing equipment brought in for the V Festival which had just finished there a day or two earlier. This had clearly been a monster event, judging by the miles of temporary roadway still in situ.

Confusingly there was also a special event on that day - a Noddy Festival or some such infant delight - and the parking arrangements and stewarding and so on were quite complicated. It was all very helpfully run, though, and we ended up in a staff-ish carpark pretty much as convenient as you could get without actually parking inside the house.

It's rather lovely there. Just by where we parked is all the central visitor stuff in an old dairy/stable/farm/whatever bit, done very attractively. The house itself is the other side of that but we just admired it from outside, and very handsome it is too.

I don't think today was an especially early start (yeah right) so by the time we'd got ourselves there and sorted, lunch was beginning to look like a priority. I can't remember if we'd brought it with, or got some or all of it as a take-away, or what. What I do remember, though, is where we ate it, which was in a superb little gazebo thing, like a miniature bandstand, with a nice view over the house's outbuildings, chapel and lake: this was exceedingly pleasant.

After that we wandered around a bit. There was a nice walled garden which, like Shugborough's, was being restored and brought back into use. I would say that this process was rather less intensive and advanced here than at Shugborough. There's a nice plantation of fruit trees which is currently a bit titchy but will grow into a fine orchard one day. I think it's some sort of reference collection with some sort of agri-academic link to a local college: it contains examples of zillions of different types.

There was also a maze but this needs years more growth before it starts to become interesting. At the moment it's a bit low-key, low-altitude, apologetic, and undermaintained. Too many dead plants are evident and it was being mildly abused by foolish people's foolish children. So it wasn't, like, one of your Top Ten Maze-Going Experiences: but hey. Still fun to see, and will improve with the passage of time.

Sort of round the corner from there - back near the Place of Lunching - we went down across lawns and past the lake and chapel to a delightful Victorian greenhouse. This proved very adequate for complex processes such as wandering around inside and sitting down outside, and was full of pretty flowers, which cannot be a bad thing.

After that we went round through a nice wooded bit (where I was tickled to briefly lose two daughters, total age thirty-six, to the adventure playground) and on to the utterly splendid miniature railway. I mean, for a start it was a miniature railway and therefore nice by definition. (If you don't like miniature railways please don't tell me, as I won't want to be your friend.) It also had pleasant helpful staff running it and, most excitingly, had a wheelchair-accessible carriage. This was actually quite cosmic home-grown engineering, involving demounting a bench to give a big flat area then securing the chair with those proper industrial ratchetty tie-downs. (I'm sure these have a name?) A teeny ramp to bridge the platform gap would've been even better, but even so this was a very fine arrangement, on which they deserve serious congratulation.

So off we chugged. Lot and Marfs rode in the back with Daisy, which was good as we were in the middle and you get to (try to) take interesting photos across the bends. Mrs von Neustadt preferred to walk so we saw her occasionally during our long and adventurous journey. It really is a good one, with all sorts of interesting wooded bits. Eleven out of ten.

The exertions of the train journey having taken their toll we needed propping up with a cream tea back in their nice café thing. A quick zoom round to admire and photograph the very smart, formal front of the house then followed.

And that, dear reader, was pretty much that: off home to our splendid Pavilion, evening-type lolling-around activities... you know the drill. I hope so anyway, for I have quite forgotten the details. Good night!

Gig-a-Blog™ (Laulan and Peyronelle, St Anne & St Agnes)

Wednesday, 19 December 2007

Laulan and Peyronelle: medieval harp, fiddle, voice.

Laulan and Peyronelle started from the west end with a processionette, which was nice.

Lovely. Lively. Incredible clarity. It's just wonderful to hear this totally different sound. They did (among many other pieces) There Is No Rose, a particularly gorgeous tune.

I was surprised by how many of these tunes I knew. I suppose it's partly that brass ensembles have been plundering this repertoire for decades: in addition some of it has been adapted and survived to modern times in, I guess, continuous use? Others seemed completely new to me - which is good too!

They do excellent chat and are highly audience-friendly. Much mention was made of the collection Piae Cantiones which I must read about - er - one day.

I very much liked the pretty, painted medieval fiddle. Apparently it's a replica of one held by a mummified saint in a church in Bologna. Oh and they sometimes added little bells in too. These probably have a proper name too, skrinks or nakers or diplocks or something. But, y'know... jabnaas.

Ah, they've just done the Coventry Carol: lovely lovely. And apologized for overrunning, which is nice (get on with it!) And just publicized their MySpace - er - spaces on the Wretched Young People's Musical Webnet Two Dot Thing. How frightfully modernistic of them. So, fair dos, here they are:

V v good and enjoyable in every way. Another St Anne and St Agnes triumph!

Gig-a-Blog™ (Annett Busse, St Anne & St Agnes)

Monday, 10 December 2007

Annett Busse (piano): works as listed/misspelt/etc below.

I was delighted to hear that Annett Busse was doing this recital, covering at short notice for the previously-announced Haydn Dickenson. This isn't because I have anything against Mr Dickenson! Far from it: as I've never heard him, this would seem somewhat unfair. No, it's just that previous experience tells me to expect a superb, absorbing recital from Busse, and I can look forward to hearing Dickenson another time, when he's all better. An exquisite twist in the tale here is that it turns out that Ms Busse is also Mrs Dickenson (or rephrase to suit your politics as required) which means it's really pretty cool having a kind of two-way inhouse depping service.

Couperin: Four pieces from the "Troisieme Ordre"

  1. Graceful, lilting
  2. Charming, minuet-like, courtly
  3. Darker, slower, poised. Gorgeous middle section, ah, in fact it's not exactly the middle section, it's one of a set of variations. Or something. Help, I'm lost. Anyway, it's nice, whatever it is structurally.
  4. Lively, bouncy, and to be honest slightly fussy melody executed with dramatic, exciting precision by this great player. But I think I need to work on my Couperin Love a bit, perhaps.

Czerny: Toccata Op. 92

Rumbustious but classy end-of-the-pier sounds. No, really! (You may laugh but one day these writings will dominate the world of musical criticism. It's just that they haven't sent me the date yet.)

Schubert: Klavierstuck in Eb major D946

Lovely, warm sound. Great piece. Makes for a really, good solid pivot in the middle of the concert.

Scriabin: Prelude et Nocturne for the left hand Op. 9

Beautiful, very romantic. I suffered from uncontrollable urges to get on steam trains all the way through this.

Scriabin: Deux Poemes Op. 32

  1. Clouds of arpeggiation, the melody growing out in fragments and slowly becoming real. Quite a gentle and warm kind of poem perhaps.
  2. Angular, quite driven: a poem of a very different sort.

Scriabin: Etude Op. 8 No. 12

Short, dramatic, a great ending.

A lovely recital. Yes please I'd like to hear hubby when he's back in the saddle, but in the meantime what a great chance this was to enjoy another concert from his excellent deputizing service.

Gig-a-Blog™ (Anakay Koshka, St Anne & St Agnes)

Monday, 3 December 2007

Anakay Koshka (violin): J S Bach, Partita No 2 in D minor BWV 1004; Sonata No 1 in G minor BWV 1001.

Pure bliss. This was one of the most fabulous concerts yet: I felt as if I could have listened, enraptured, all day.

It seems ridiculous to be trying to pick things out from an amazing concert like this, and anyway I didn't want to even try to make notes because I felt so bound up in the atmosphere. Nevertheless I must just mention the ciaccona (chaconne) which is such a massive, profound movement that it takes your breath away. In fact I see it gets a pretty good press (for example here on the Wiki) and indeed Mrs von Neustadt, no reluctant critic of fiddle players, was, like, nuff respeck due over this whole programme. (In other words, no, it's not just me. Phew.)

Hats off to Anakay Koshka for a truly stunning performance.

Gig-a-Blog™ (Anakay Koshka and Alan Brown, St Anne & St Agnes)

Friday, 30 November 2007

Anakay Koshka (violin) and Alan Brown (piano): Beethoven, Sonata No 2 Op 12 in A major; Brahms: Violin Concerto Op 77 in D major

Beethoven

Oh dear my notes are in a mess. But amongst other things I said that the first movement was "dynamic but light, witty" and that the Andante piu tosto was poised and gorgeous.

Oh and I seem to have thought that the Allegro piacevole offered "bright simplicity with moments of darker, more complex passion." But then what do I know, eh?

Brahms

An exciting, passionate performance. I'm never sure about concerto transcriptions but this was a rather elegant argument in their favour. The slow movement here was particularly striking.

This was a very enjoyable concert and I'm glad I dragged my reluctant bones down the road to listen. 

The search for the Perfect Chicken Korma: The Tiffin Tin

I know it's a sad failure for my image development (ho ho) as a trumpet player but I don't really like very hot curries and never have. And yes, I know it's terribly pedestrian and unimaginative of me but I quite often end up having a chicken korma because I feel reasonably safe with that and I know I will usually like it, or at least that it will not frighten the horses.

Recently, however, I have started to feel rather dissatisfied with some of the chicken kormas supplied by the average High Street restaurant/takeaway. The problem, I feel, is that the lack of spiciness can lead to a certain blandness: it's as if, somehow, the broader landscape of hot-spicy food leaves more room for the chef to manoeuvre and to deploy interesting flavours. Conversely, the less-hot environment seems to sometimes leave little room for variety and you can get a pretty uninspiring meal out of it. Mild should surely not have to mean characterless but this is what often happens here.

A very good example of this was served to me recently in Salisbury, where we were doing a Christmas Oratorio at the Cathedral. (I ought to write about this some time but goodness knows when.) It was a perfectly nice restaurant, that the brass section has been to often before, but the chicken korma really was a huge disappointment. It was so bland and sweet and untroubled by any real flavour or interest - in fact it was really like eating chicken in a yellow condensed milk sauce - just sweet, and pretty much nothing else. Why would you want to eat this when Indian food can be so interesting?

And hence my quest for the Perfect Chicken Korma, or at any rate for Some Better Chicken Kormas. That is, I know that it can be better than this but I don't that often encounter the better ones, so I am going to try to identify and remember them, and avoid as far as possible the sad boring ones.

My first Fantastic Chicken Korma Award goes to The Tiffin Tin. This wonderful takeaway in Hornsey High Street (020 8347 7700) has much to recommend it anyway and if you are local and have not tried it yet then I urge you, please, to do so - but apart from its general wonderfulness it has quite stolen my heart with its delicious chicken korma. This is an interesting, subtly flavoured dish with all sorts of interesting stuff going on - I couldn't even begin to list it for you but please take it from me that it is a world away from the sickly custard-like stuff I got in Salisbury. I would love to know, in fact, what would happen if the Salisbury chef could try the Tiffin Tin chicken korma - would he/she love it, hate it, give up, resolve to do better, or what? The fact is, it has the same name but is really not the same dish. A bad chicken korma just makes you wish it was over - it's a feeble toot on a party squeaker: the Tiffin Tin one is a whole symphony in glorious stereo and makes you wish the sensation could go on all evening. Marks out of ten? Ninety-six! Yum.

PS There's another Tiffin Tin opening soon (or already there?) in Junction Road, N19. If it is as good as the Hornsey one it is going to have many good friends very fast.

Happy New Year

White Rabbit.

I wish you all a Happy New Year. I hope that 2008 will fulfil and indeed surpass your highest expectations, and completely thwart any of your worries and concerns by being at least 267% better than you feared even in your most depressed moment. Oh hang on that's for me. Well never mind, I wish it for you too. It's supposed to work if you give a present you'd like to receive, isn't it?? So please be bathed in the radiance of my New Year wish for me, er, that is, you.

:)

2008 is of course a Leap Year which is exciting in an obscure way. I suppose it's the realization that we have to do something rather odd because bits of the solar system don't quite fit other bits even if you divide by 9/5 and add 32. Imagine trying to explain it to an alien and they're going "but why didn't you just divide your glodnicks into an equal number of skrrolts? What's this 365.242375 nonsense about?" Or maybe they'd say, "wow, that's a really quite elegant solution for such a primitive planet. Here, have a strawberry xrbbtss!"

According to RandomlyRelevantAndAccurateAtTimesIpedia, 2008 is the:

  • International Year of Planet Earth;
  • European Year of Intercultural Dialogue;
  • Australian Year of the Scout;
  • International Year of the Potato;
  • International Year of Sanitation.

I feel that this list barely lifts the lid (arf!) and that there must be many hundreds if not thousands of other "Years Of" that 2008 will be. But it's a start. I am far too fat and lazy (none of my New Year's Resolutions or indeed NY Resolutions, aha, having yet taken effect) to actually look any of this stuff up, but potatoes sounds promising. It's one of those fields (aha) like wine, whisky, cheese and apples where I would like to know more and pretend to know the difference between a Désirée and a King Edward. Oh dear I am trivializing - I cheated and looked it up and it's about poverty and ordinary people and stuff, how appalling. I will instruct Mr Thompson to send a small donation on our behalf.

What else? Scouting: excellent, scouting in Australia, ditto; Intercultural Dialogue: fabulous, what the h*ll do you think we are doing right now? great stuff; Planet Earth - yes, jolly good thing too, give it a year - seems quite a broad topic but I am sure some face-painting will help clarify its goals.

Sanitation - damn right. I dare not look this up either as it will turn out to be all worthy and not a good topic for Schloss-dwellers to joke about. Here, indeed, we have had excellent sanitation since 1263 - actually I think it's been the same family of peasants carting it away since then. I must ask Mr Thompson to find out their surname (if they have one) and send them a shilling or something. I seem to recall that we perhaps burnt down their cottage in 1782 or sometime when the service lagged a little and things started to back up somewhat, but they were cheerily back at work soon enough after a generation or two and I am sure there are no hard feelings. Anyway I will support this event to its fullest, er, depth, though I'm not sure how the face-painting will work out, nor what snappy slogan will look good on the posters, but they can probably get Virgin Active's publicity people to work something out. I'm offering them "Disease Is Bad lol !" as a freebie but if they want to use "Proper Toilets Are Rilly Rilly Good lol !" then they can entertain an invoice for it like my other clients. You have to pay for quality like that.

Right, that's 2008 sorted out. Onwards and upwards: Happy New Year.

Monday, 31 December 2007

Virgin Media Customer Service

First, a traditional merry Yuletide joke:

Q. What, pray, is the difference between Virgin Media's Customer Service effort, and a bucket of sh*t?

A. The bucket. (Aha, haha, ahaha: Your Grace is more than witty this fine afternoon.)

And what, you ask, has brought this on?

Why, when my aristocratic breeding demands good manners, am I writing the Dreadful Anglo-Saxon Poo-Word with a mere asterisk to (hardly) spare the blushes of my more delicate readers?

Well: would you like a blow-by-blow, line-by-line, minute-by-minute account of why I am so cheesed off with Mr Branson and his fine, fine company? Would you, perhaps, like me to tell you where exactly - with regard to the person of Mr Branson - I would currently like to put his undoubtedly splendid V+ box?

No, me neither. So let us instead retire to the Bullet Point Conservatory and dismiss the matter briefly over a pleasant cup of tea:

  • Broken appointments and major time wasting for my family and me;
  • Lots and lots and lots of very, very annoying phone calls;
  • Something which may be lies but it might be more courteous to describe as a tendency towards chronic inaccuracy;
  • I can teach a Border Collie to stick its head through a gap in the stairs on the command "Gargoyle!" In fact it was quite easy. I cannot, however, teach Virgin Media to call me on the correct telephone number, no matter how much effort I expend. Perhaps I am using the wrong sort of biscuits?
  • Most people there to whom I speak to seem to be pleasant enough and perhaps aware that they are not, actually, providing me with a good service. Indeed one apologized this morning, which was an exciting first. Thank you - that really was much appreciated.
  • Others, though, are pathetic and defensive and hide behind their company's dreadful inefficient procedures, or what they claim are those procedures. It would be nice to think that such people could be rooted out and sacked but in reality they are probably more likely to be promoted.
  • The nice and competent-sounding person to whom I spoke second today has arranged the second attempt at an installation, which - assuming it takes place as planned - will be a mere fortnight after my family started wasting its time and my blood pressure started its present climb.
  • The first person to whom I spoke today - well, I diskard her, as Molesworth sa.
  • Finally, a moment of light relief which cheered me up immensely. This morning while hanging around in Telephone Purgatory I was told (by Not Good Helpline Person) that I was being put through to the right people to help. A silence then ensued, then a strange recorded announcement, about quotas, which was clearly not meant for my ears. Finally a man answered with something technical and incomprehensible and asked if he could help me. I explained my quest. There was a thoughtful silence then, in tones of almost radiant wonderment, "are you a Member of the Public?"

Great stuff. I do of course look forward to seeing this exciting device in and working - though not all that soon - but, frankly, if I had a real choice I would not touch this company again with a long, disinfected, Teflon-coated bargepole.

But do please have another cuppa, and try the Christmas cake: it is rather fine. And a very good afternoon to you, too.

 

Update on 13th January: well, the machine in question is now in and working. The appointment made by the second customer services person did work out, hurrah, and a really nice engineer came on Friday and fitted the box. The whole business of the complaints procedure and so on has never really worked out. They've rung up once or twice (having finally understood how to do so) and said they would call back when I was in, but it has not happened. In a sense I can't really see how this would now benefit me - they already cut the price in half as a result of their error and I cannot imagine they are offering me anything more than that, so it would just be the satisfaction of hearing them say sorry, and I can probably live without that. The box, by the way, is superb. So I will give them two rousing cheers for the bits that went well and for how good their device is, and one rousing raspberry for their uselessness in other ways, and call it quits.

Sunday, 30 December 2007

Van Hire Heroes

Let us just suppose that your Christmas arrangements had become a "touch complicated", and that, due to the brilliance of a certain local government person called Sally, your eldest daughter, who may or may not be a Crown Princess, is getting a four night midweek away weekend super duper intercity boutique accommodation winter break in the very swish Highgate Nursing Home over the said festival of jollity.

Let us further suppose that, while the Manchester-London trip is laid on and delivered courtesy of two utterly fabulous blokes from the North West Ambulance Service, the return trip cannot be provided in the same way.

Let us further further suppose that the Crown Princess in question isn't going to be too thrilled if, having gone as far as reaching Hornsey Lane, she's then stuck there. Not unreasonably, she might like to visit Schloss Neustadt and indeed the Grandparental Mansion, which is where the Monster Extended Family Christmas Dinner will take place. Which is about x % of the whole point, really. Where x is a positive integer - quite a big one, ack'shly.

Let us further further further suppose that the family car is not up to the present task. Despite its fine performance in Ingestre (qv) it can't accommodate a wheelchair with person in it, and even if in some alternate reality it could, I'd still cheerfully bet you a Christmas pud that this particular wheelchair, being something of a long wheelbase model, would defeat pretty much anything you could arrange that involved something that looked even a touch like a family car.

So, basically, everything is fine, but everything is about to fall apart without the right vehicle.

Who ya gonna call?

AVH Ltd, that's who. (Adapted Vehicle Hire, geddit?) They are:

Adapted Vehicle Hire Ltd,
Stanford House, Station Approach
Greenford
UB6 0AL
0845 257 1670
http://www.avhltd.com/

This wonderful, genius company does exactly what it says on the tin: it hires out adapted vehicles. If you look at the website you'll see that they do vehicles with driver adaptations; but this was not what we were after in this particular case. So they hired us a massive great VW Transporter van with wheelchair tiedowns and a tail-lift. This was just superb. And I thought that the lift would be all "attach trunnion A to bearing bracket B" and "tighten clamp P before installing torque dihedral flange Q" - but, er, no. It has an on/off switch and then four buttons on a wired hand control - deploy - down - up - stow. And that's yer lot.

The van seemed pretty much brand new and drove like a dream. I quite like driving big vehicles so that was OK (though the parking at Highgate was pretty scary, requiring much threading through backwards in a car-park sometimes terrifyingly full of semirandomly parked cars - no straight lines). The van did many local trips, including facilitating the all-important dinner on December 25th, and then we used it for the return trip to Manchester on Thursday.

It's not cheap and AVH is not a charity. But you get what you pay for and what we got here is superb people, vehicle and service. If/when I need this kind of hire again I will be straight back to this brilliant company without a moment's hesitation.

Finally, my Inner Nerd insists that I point out to you that it's exciting because it's based right next to Greenford station. Greenford has Central Line tube and national rail trains to Paddington. It's interesting because it has what seems to be the last remaining wooden escalator on the whole network. Oh and the BR (or whatever) trains come into a weird little terminus platform in a bay between the two Tube tracks going through. Satisfyingly odd. Oh yes I mean it has good access from London too, sure, so it is nice and convenient for here, but that's not what the nerd in me liked so much. Ahem indeed no.

Thursday, 13 December 2007

Getting there

Well, I got the main news file in for print last night, on (the much-revised) schedule as agreed. And now I've just sent in an extra file with two late stories. It would be lovely to think I am finished, but I am still not quite there:

  • My friend and neighbour JF may sooner or later send me a line or two to add to an obituary. If this happens soonish then I still want to try to add it to the print version
  • I still have to do the photos for print, but that's easy

When these two things are resolved, that's the current news file pretty much done. Woo, etc.

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

Jabnaas - just a blog not an authoritative source

Or, how to learn to relax and go with the jabnaas.

JABNAAS - just a blog not an authoritative source. Since shortly after its first known appearance in December 2007 it has tended to be used in all-lowercase, thus: jabnaas.

Usage:

  1. To remind the reader that a blog is, after all, just a blog. Unless it makes very clear and verifiable claims to some sort of authority, it is not to be taken too seriously on such subjects as:
  • Meissen porcelain
  • French painting
  • Bartók’s string quartets
  • Satellites
  • Ant and Dec
  • William Harvey
  • Anything at all
  1. To remind the blogger of much the same thing: to wit, it will not directly and immediately cause the Thames to freeze over, and ninety-six species of butterfly to become extinct, if you leave some fact unverified or indeed unknown. In fact, it will cause not even the merest ripple in the basic rate of income tax should you get Ant's birthday or Dec's shoe size wrong, and not bother to check it, and it then stays wrong for a decade or more till someone with real OCD checks, or someone who knows happens along, or maybe Ant and/or Dec pop in to say hello and enlighten blogger and blogreader alike.

So: Jabnaas - leave it, get over it, it doesn't matter that much. (Yes Vogel, pay attention, I am talking to you dear boy.)

You see, ever since the tragic disappointment of "blognorance", I've been racking my several remaining brain cells trying to think of a witty neologism, partly as a shorthand for use in the blog, and partly (well more so really, to be honest) to try to make myself feel better over the previous debacle and the 83 gun-jumping swine (now there's an interestingly mixed metaphor) who have selfishly and irresponsibly used my word, without a care for my feelings, before, er, I thought of it.

I wanted, as I say, a witty neologism but jabnaas is what I got instead. Oh well. It'll have to do. Maybe I will grow to love it, like Brussels sprouts. I sort-of concluded that acrostic or acronym (or whatever - jabnaas!) was probably the only way to go, short of just plucking a word absolutely out of thin air, because all the cleverisms like blognorance or bloglectful had been bagsied years ago. And anyway there's only so much pleasure to be had from flogging a dead horse and this one seems pretty much all flogged out, poor old thing.

I did look at some other possibilities:

  • jabasynteb
    just a blog about strawberry yoghurt not the Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • jabnteb
    just a blog not the Encyclopædia Britannica
  • jabnae
    just a blog not an encyclopædia
  • jabnarf
    just a blog not a reference library

- and their fouler-mouthed variants (cover your ears, Tamsin):

  • jabasyntefb
  • jabntefb
  • jabnafe
  • jabnafrf

- but as you see they are all a bit rubbish (OK, quite a lot rubbish), and jabnaas, the best of a bad bunch, at least has the advantage that it is almost pronounceable, that it sounds vaguely funny, and that it might, seen in the right light, be a slightly threatening description in some English dialect of, perhaps, a medical procedure of some sort – who knows?

Anyway, for better or worse, jabnaas it now is. I intend to refer frequently to this page in the course of trying to save myself from a nervous breakdown while obsessing about how much to put in about the West Coast Main Line or (depending on definitions) which car · I · owned · first. Jabnaas.

As of right now, Googling it does not work. Hurrah, huzzah, a half-holiday and a commemorative basket for the peasant children.

Remember: jabnaas - just a blog not an authoritative source.

You know it makes sense. (Perhaps)

I know it makes sense. (Almost definitely.)

Ant and Dec - well, they probably don't care. Hah - more fools them.

Jabnaas!!

Monday, 10 December 2007

Backblog

Service is a wee bit slow at present: sorry. I've written a few little things but I need some time to finish off, sort out photos, and the like, and this "time" is what I don't currently have, hence the backlog.

I am having a Trumpet News Deadline Crisis (TNDC) right now but once it is over - in a day or two, nervous breakdowns permitting - I will try to get back to the blog a bit.

Note that the current TNDC is the second-and-a-halfth-last ever: I have another one due February 1st but after that I hand the half-cooked file, betwixt deadlines, to my successors. along with the web pages, and lots of goodwill and positive thought-beaming.

Yay and woo, ahem yes. It's now 123 days to go.

Onwards and upwards!

Friday, 7 December 2007

Christmas List (tragic)

I have just had the sad (in both the trad and pejorative modern senses) realization that one of the things I'd really like for Christmas is:

Four days alone in the office, no-one knows I am here, phone and internet disconnected, doing nothing but RUTHLESS tidying up till there are no piles of anything anywhere and just clear surfaces as far as the eye can see.

I can't tell you how sad it makes me feel that this is something I really rather covet and would prefer to several nice jumpers and pairs of socks. (But not a train set.)

Of course, this is not the only thing on my list. There are, believe me, larger and smaller things, more and less tangible both, but as you know this blog avoids serious thought at all costs so we shall stick to trivia. And I am here right now and this is what suddenly occurred to me as something I'd really quite love. The reason this came up now is I am on leave but in the office, because I am on my way to Manchester to see the Crown Princess, but my train goes a bit later so I came in early and have sneakily been working for a while with no-one knowing I am here, and it is marvellous.

Basically, there is something wrong with pretty much my entire Weltanschauung, really, isn't there? Oh well.

Thursday, 6 December 2007

Blognorance, and the Software of the Blogging; the splendidnosity of the technical installation

Blognorance

Dammit! I thought I had perhaps invented the term "blognorance" but Googling it brings up 83 references already. Probably about 82 of those people think they invented it too: indeed you can even see such a claim in one of the teeny random Google summaries ("we show you bits of random misleading text in order to save you time on getting randomly confused on the interwebnet - get randomly confused faster and better on one page!")

Sigh. Is there nothing new under the sun?
(Answer = no, lard boy, there is not.)

Software

Othergates: Windows Live Writer, despite its being a Micro$oft product, is something I have rather liked. Now, however, I can no longer save drafts to the online blogging server computer box device: it says it's saving a draft but it actually publishes it, which is a bit dirty-washing-in-public, if you ask me; oh you didn't, well never mind. (Update on 1st January: they have fixed this so save-draft-to-server now once more works like a charm. Hurrah.)

In the profound depths of my ignorance (would've-been blognorance, tsk) I do not know whether this is WLW or the server side playing up, nor do I know how I would find out. But one thing that strikes me is that my depending only on WLW or the web interface is going to help preserve this state of ignorance well past its sell-by date because I have no alternative to check against.

So ... what other blog client PC software, that would work well with this blog, should I look at? It doesn't have to be free, it does have to be good. Idiot-proof would be handy, too, as I work in computers and am therefore disgracefully and utterly rubbish with them. All suggestions gratefully read, and rewarded with chocolate where practicable and affordable. (Exceptions may apply, offer not available in all territories, your mileage may vary, close cover before striking.)

Note: I also did not invent "othergates", though I love it very much. I am pretty sure, though, that I know who did: it was my slowly mutating, interesting and amusing (and occasionally worrying) friend Verlaine from LiveJournal and before that from Monochrome, eee them were t'days. But if you think you invented "othergates" please do not hesitate not to write and tell me about it, ever.

... Update: of course, I am wrong, and it was an older word that went out of favour. Maybe Verlaine has reintroduced it? Sigh - I don't know, and certainly don't have time to research it. Isn't it annoying the way almost everything you "know" turns out, sooner or later, to be incorrect?

Splendidnosity of the technical installation

Some nice chaps are drilling holes at the office. Eventually this will lead - next week I think - to the installation of permanent LCD projectors for the seminar rooms. This in turn leads to the death - three rousing cheers - of the practices of grovelling around on the floor, running cable, installing safety strips and other bl**dy ludicrous wastes of time. I know it sounds trivial but I have spent HOURS - not one of them pleasurable, satisfying or worthwhile - doing this over the last almost-decade and it's a great pleasure to think that we will in future be perhaps just that tiny bit more professional and sorted. This is all the initiative of Jonathan, IT geezer for the cancer folk next door, and I would hug him were it not likely to be embarrassing. Yup, yup and yuppity yoooo!

Wednesday, 28 November 2007

Historical or Geological?

Having been all inspired by going to Paris (read: Orsay + Louvre) last weekend, I thought I should look for an art history book to try to fight a rearguard action against my tragic levels of ignorance. I wondered about just getting Gombrich (as in "you can't go wrong with Gombrich") but thought perhaps one should look at other possibilities so I visited the online shopping emporium of my friend Mr Amazon to see what I might see.

So I went :

Books >
Art, Architecture & Photography >
History of Art & Architecture

- which seemed reasonable, and there at NUMBER THREE in the list - which contains just over 42,000 titles but I am sure you know that - is this book:

Cliff: An Intimate Portrait of a Living Legend
by Tim Ewbank & Stafford Hildred
Virgin Books (6 Sep 2007)

Erm ... ermm ... ermmm ... most odd. In fact, Cliff's not even the only oddity in the Top Ten that I am seeing right now, though he is certainly the most surprising.

What goes on here? I mean, I could guess, but I'd love to know.

Update on 9th January 2008. If you do the same thing today, the list in general makes more sense. It is still a little odd, given what it says on the tin, but not, mostly, wildly off either. Cliff has gone - or at least he is no longer near the top, which will do. However, the no. 3 slot is now occupied by this:

Somebody Else's Kids: They Were Problem Children No One Wanted! Until One Teacher Took Them to Her Heart
by Torey L. Hayden
Harper Element (1 Oct 2007)

- which, although I am sure is a jolly good book, also seems on the face of it to have fairly little to do with "History of Art & Architecture". So ... two theories. (1) Slot no 3 on the list is haunted and this is the result of poltergeist activity; (2) some art student type is working as a product editor at Amazon and this is an elaborate piece of site-specific art they are doing as a project called "What Is Art History Really?" Next week the number three slot will be occupied by a book about aircraft carriers and then one on sheepdog trials. Eventually they will have at all put together as a nice slide show and we can all laugh at the sheer wackiness of it.



Unless of course you have a better explanation??? :)

Gig-a-behaviour-o-Blog™

I've just discarded - as excessively mad and angry even for me - two attempts at a gibberation about concert behaviour, inspired in part by Monday's lunchtime at St Anne & St Agnes. Here's a third try with fewer words and less passion.

Lunchtime concerts are special and different and it's reasonable up to a point to expect more noise, more comings and goings, and so on: one should be more tolerant, sure. I very much like the somewhat informal atmosphere. Nevertheless there are a few things which I feel would generally help:

  • Money. Don't touch any, ever, while music is playing. Just don't. At all.
  • Plastic bags. Ditto.
  • Applause. A tricky and highly specialized skill. If unsure, seek professional assistance.
  • Overrunning (lunchtime-specific note for musicians). Don't do it.

There. I almost feel better.

Tuesday, 27 November 2007

Gig-a-Blog™ (Anima String Quartet, St Anne & St Agnes)

Monday, 26 November 2007

Anima String Quartet. Haydn: String Quartet in C, Op 74 No 1; Bartók: String Quartet No 6.

A most enjoyable and interesting concert with the Haydn's cheerfulness contrasting strongly with the complexity and tension of the Bartók. Great ensemble playing throughout, and a wonderful solo viola start to the Bartók from Carolyn Ichinose.

I ought to be able to say a lot more about this excellent concert but, sorry, I'm exhausted and didn't feel like writing - so please feel free to ask for a refund. Thank you.

Monday, 26 November 2007

Lunar Landing

I was interested to hear, in a comment from Joel Garthwaite, that the Lunar Saxophone Quartet have a London gig coming up: it's on Tuesday 18th December, 7.30, at The Warehouse in Waterloo. If you have a look at the LSQ site, linked above, you'll find full details and ticket ordering and stuff.

To see why I am telling you about this please read my previous write-up of an LSQ gig at St Anne's. They are excellent. Nuff said.